Marketing for charities and fundraising teams
Regular giving pays the salaries, so acquisition is judged on what a donor is still worth in year three.
Where the money moves.
The number that matters is not cost per acquisition, it is cost per acquired regular giver set against attrition. A director of fundraising can defend a high upfront cost when month-three and month-twelve retention hold and the payback lands inside the window the board agreed to. Cheap sign-ups that lapse before the second debit cannot be defended at all. So the whole programme gets built around the survival curve: which channel produces donors who stay, which ask amount survives contact with a bank account, and where the leak actually sits between the form and the first successful payment.
Compliance shapes this work more than it does in commercial categories. Registration with the ACNC and its governance standards, deductible gift recipient status and correct receipting, fundraising licences that still differ state by state, and the Fundraising Institute Australia code all sit over the top of any appeal. Add the rules that apply when a charity telephones a donor and the practical result is that creative, data handling and the donation form have to be approved as one thing. Retro-fitting compliance to an appeal already in market is where reputational damage comes from.
The calendar carries two immovable peaks and one that arrives without notice. June brings the tax appeal into an inbox crowded with every other cause making the same argument, so the differentiator is specificity: a named programme, a costed outcome, and a warm donor asked something different from a cold prospect. December runs on emotion and gift-in-honour behaviour. Then a fire or a flood happens, the plan is suspended for a rapid-response appeal that has to be live almost immediately, compliant, and honest about where money goes once the emergency passes.
A great deal of regular giving is lost at the payment layer rather than at the pitch. Card expiry, dishonours, declined debits and a weak retry sequence quietly remove donors who never intended to leave. A card updater service and a proper recovery flow bring those donors back without the programme buying them a second time. Upgrade asks, a mid-value pathway for donors giving above the average, and a thank-you that reaches them before the first debit are the same kind of work: unspectacular, measurable, and where lifetime value is genuinely made.
What we run.
Digital regular giving acquisition
Paid social and search into a form built for completion on a phone, with the ask amount, debit date and payment method tested as hard as the creative. Reported on donors still giving at month twelve rather than on sign-up counts.
The June appeal, built in April
Segmented asks across warm donors, lapsed donors and cold prospects, one costed outcome carrying the persuasion, and the landing page, receipting and thank-you flow tested before the crowded fortnight starts rather than during it.
Rapid response readiness
A pre-built appeal shell, approved holding creative and a compliance checklist kept ready, so a disaster appeal can go live with the licence positions, receipting and wording already correct instead of assembled under pressure.
Ad Grant and paid search together
The in-kind grant account managed against its own policy rules, including the click-through threshold and keyword restrictions, and structured to cover informational searches while the paid account takes the donation intent.
Retention, recovery and upgrade
Welcome journeys, dishonour recovery, card updater, annual upgrade asks and a mid-value pathway. Reporting reads attrition by cohort and by channel, so acquisition choices get corrected by what those donors did afterwards.
Questions we get asked.
Not to replace it, to reduce single-channel exposure. Street and door programmes are vulnerable to site access, weather and supplier capacity, and their attrition profile is already familiar to your board. A digital regular giving stream with its own curve gives you a second source and a comparison point, and the two tend to recruit different donor ages.
By doing the compliance work before the emergency. The appeal shell, licence positions, receipting logic and the wording about surplus funds are prepared and approved in calm conditions, then the specific cause, imagery and figures drop into place. What is left on the day is factual accuracy, not legal review.
Then the reporting is built for that conversation. Acquisition cost is presented next to projected lifetime value and the payback point, with attrition assumptions stated rather than implied, so a high first-year cost reads as an investment with a return date attached. Cohort tables do this far better than a single blended ratio ever will.
It supports it. Older cash donors respond to mail and often check online before giving, so search and a clean donation page catch the ones who would otherwise abandon. The larger opportunity is conversion to regular giving through a phone or email journey timed after a strong cash gift, which is where untapped lifetime value tends to sit.
Also in not-for-profit
Talk to us.
9 services under one team, run against the numbers your business already reports on.
Contact the Ignis Team
Send through your details and we will audit your business before we reply.