Environmental consulting marketing
Marketing for consultancies whose work arrives by referral from developers, councils and law firms, aimed squarely at the technical authority and panel positions that keep that referral base widening.
Where the money moves.
A Managing Principal reads the same risk in every fee forecast: too much of next year sits with a handful of referrers. A planner at a developer, a council manager who has used the firm for years, a partner who runs contaminated land disputes. Those relationships are real and they are also fragile, because they walk out the door when the person does. Marketing in a consultancy is not there to replace referral. It is there to widen the base until a single departure stops being a revenue event and becomes an inconvenience.
Authority in this market is technical or it is nothing. The people who send work read papers, sit through EIANZ sessions, and can tell inside a paragraph whether the author has run a detailed site investigation or written around one. So the content comes from your accredited people and the production comes from us: an assessor explaining how a plot layout survived review under the Biodiversity Assessment Method, a contaminated land lead on what a site auditor sends back most often, a PFAS note current with the guidance rather than the version from three years ago. Signed by the person, not the firm.
Panels are the other half. Council prequalification, state agency schemes, transport authority arrangements, developer preferred supplier lists, each with its own refresh date and submission format. Getting onto a panel is a procurement exercise. Staying useful on it is a marketing one, because a panel is only a right to be asked. A requesting officer picks the name they already attach to the discipline, and that association gets built in the months between refreshes by capability material, project sheets and search visibility.
Timing follows the planning system and the financial year. Approval pathways, assessment requirements, EPBC referrals and seasonal survey windows decide when work can physically be done, and the June cycle decides when councils and agencies spend. Reporting is written against fees: which enquiries arrived without a referrer attached, which disciplines attracted them, which panels moved from listed to used, which pages a submission reviewer read before shortlisting. Utilisation follows work won, so the measure that matters to a principal is whether the pipeline diversified.
What we run.
Technical writing under your people's names
Investigation notes, guidance updates and method explanations authored by your accredited assessors and contaminated land leads, drafted from their real jobs and edited to publish. The referrer reads it and remembers the person, which is exactly how a referral base widens.
Project sheets that survive procurement
One page per project covering scope, discipline, approval pathway and outcome, formatted to drop straight into a panel submission or an expression of interest. Written once properly, they stop every tender beginning with a hunt through old reports.
Search for the discipline and the trigger
The queries that precede a phone call are specific: preliminary site investigation requirements, an offset obligation, an acid sulfate soil trigger in a named local government area. Pages built for those questions bring in the enquiry that never had a referrer behind it.
Referrer communication that respects the relationship
Briefing notes and short sessions for the planners, lawyers and council officers who send work, produced on a schedule so contact happens when the firm has something useful rather than only when it needs something. Email and a room, not advertising.
The firm's site as a credibility test
A reviewer checks the website in the gap between reading a submission and shortlisting. Discipline pages, team credentials, current accreditations and real projects, structured so that check confirms the decision instead of raising a question.
Questions we get asked.
Less than writing it themselves, because the work is talking rather than drafting. We interview, write, and send back something they correct instead of compose. Technical accuracy has to come from them, because a referrer reading a site investigation note will spot a wrong trigger or an outdated guideline immediately. Editing, production and publishing sit with us.
It helps before and after, not during. Before, because a requesting officer picks from a panel by recognition, and recognition is built by published work. After, because a project sheet library and current capability material make each submission faster and more consistent. The bid itself stays your team's document.
It splits the pages, which is correct. Each discipline has its own referrer, its own regulatory trigger and its own search behaviour, so each gets a content line and an enquiry path of its own. The firm level story sits above them for panels and for clients who want one supplier across the lot.
By enquiry source and pipeline composition, tracked from first contact through to fee proposal. The leading measures are non-referral enquiries, discipline mix and panel activity. The lagging measure is fee revenue from work that did not come through an existing referrer, which is the number a principal is actually managing.
Also in environmental services
Talk to us.
9 services under one team, run against the numbers your business already reports on.
Contact the Ignis Team
Send through your details and we will audit your business before we reply.